Later this week in Paris, climate scientists will issue a dire forecast for the planet that warns of slowly rising sea levels and higher temperatures in the final draft of a new report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

But it will likely be a watered-down version of the global warming threat. Pun intended. For example, the report apparently doesn’t account for recent ice shelf collapses in Antarctica or accelerating glacial melt in Greenland. In 2002, Antarctica’s 1,255-square-mile Larsen B ice shelf broke off and disappeared in a mere 35 days. And recent NASA data shows that Greenland is losing 53 cubic miles of ice each year – twice the rate as in 1996. Previous studies haven’t accounted for ice shelf deterioration, so it will take another round of hard science (and another report in a future year) to measure what appears to be an increasing rate of ice melt.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was established by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program in 1988. Nearly 2,000 scientists involved in the study were selected using criteria such as area of scientific expertise, home country, and a range of views on the subject.

Link to article.
Link to home page of upcoming study.



Devastated by Hurricane Katrina, the beachfront towns of south Mississippi are now facing unprecedented environmental threats by developers. Most recently, they’ve begun knocking down formerly “protected” trees to make room for their ambitious condo and commercial building projects. It appears the local city governments are powerless and the money people are moving in to stay in Biloxi and Gulfport. What a shame.

Link to article in the Sun-Herald.

Finally. 10 CEOs of major U.S. companies are urging George Bush to take action and address global warming in his upcoming state of the Union address. This means he’ll bow and scrape for a few minutes, mutter the necessary platitudes, and move on to his favorite agenda:

Link to article.

Living on Earth provides a poignant look into the lives of trash pickers living near the gigantic garbage dump Payatas just outside Manila, Phillipines.

Link to article.

Ever feel you’re fighting a losing battle on the environment? Welcome to the club. “We” are definitely the underdogs. But please don’t stop trying or spreading the word.

I eat almost no animal products. I don’t drive a car to work every day, I work on my computers from home. I wear extra layers of clothing instead of reaching for the thermostat. I sometimes wear Ugg boots indoors. I recycle as much as possible. I compost all organic matter. I’m doing my part, but it’s still not enough.

I have two neighbors who live entirely off the grid and have for over 30 years. That’s no electricity, period. They do burn wood to stay warm, but their house is well built out of Montana-grown logs. Their water comes from a free-flowing stream which they and others in our community protect and manage vigorously, especially during the winter when a hard freeze can divert the stream out of its banks.

But it’s still not enough.

Their position is rare in post-modern America. Homesteaders living off the grid and disavowing the conveniences of today except for a phone and a pickup truck. He runs a pack guide service in the Bitterroot National Forest. He lives a 19th century lifestyle along with his wife. If he were somehow elected president, it would quickly become a bloodbath in suburban and urban America.

This guy doesn’t negotiate. He takes action. He’d kill all of us in the ‘burbs for being so…selfish and stupid. His indignation is righteous and sincere. His contention: Talk is cheap when it comes to the environment, people are all scammers and bullshitters who ultimately don’t give a shit about anyone but themselves. And most people can’t handle nature. (Of this, he’s seen plenty of softies crying for the comforts of home while camped somewhere in the vast wilderness he calls his backyard.)

I think he’s spot on, but it’s still not enough.


The venerable “Doomsday Clock” from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has been expanded to include the ever increasing climate threat.

Add global warming to nuclear threats. Move the minute hand to five minutes before midnight. Set your alarm. Sweet dreams…

Link to article


This pic was forwarded to me by Jack Herbert. I assume it was taken in Montana; I have no idea who took it, but it’s fabulous. Looks like the eagle won the battle for the carcass.

Here’s a telltale sign of things to come. Now you can’t even purchase homeowner insurance coverage from a major insurer if you live or have a second home at the current sea level along much of the eastern United States coast.

Could the Gulf Coast be next?

Link to article

Earth’s Human Population (in billions)

1800: 1.0
1900: 1.7
2000: 6.1
2100: a range of possible scenarios:

a) with one-child families: 1.4
b) with two-child families: 8.7
c) at year 2001 growth rate: 22.2

Note: 1 billion = 1,000 million = 1,000,000,000

In 2001, the growth rate (birth rate minus death rate) of the world population was 1.3 percent per year. If this rate of growth remains constant into the future, there will be 22.2 billion people on Earth in the year 2100. Just in time for the oceans to rise and wipe out hundreds of the world’s largest cities.

Thanks to http://www.rprogress.org/newprojects/ecolFoot/faq/index.shtml for the information. Original data derived from: UN Population Division, http://esa.un.org/unpp, “World Population Prospects” (World population database, 2000) and Population Resources Bureau, http://www.prb.org.

I grew up in Gulfport, Mississippi, attending high school in Gulfport and college at the University of Southern Mississippi. And to illustrate the span of time I spent in the area, I also went through Hurricane Camille in 1969. I was 13 years old. I left southern Mississippi in 1980 to move to Utah, but until recently my mother and two sisters lived there, providing many reasons to return at least once a year.

My most recent trip was in late August 2006, when I attended a College Park neighborhood reunion. It had been exactly one year since Katrina sucker punched a 200-mile stretch of coastline from Mobile, Alabama to well past New Orleans.

As luck would have it I also happened to be on the “Coast” to attend my 30th high school class reunion in late August 2005 when Hurricane Katrina struck.

My family’s home was, from 1972 until it sold to a real estate speculator in October, 2006, located just over the railroad tracks, directly north of the now-condemned US Naval Retirement Home on the Service Drive in east Gulfport.

What strikes me now is the utter devastation that still remains in the form of thousands of broom-clean slabs, although considerably tidier without the mountains of debris beside them. But in places like east Biloxi, Point Cadet? The Imperial Palace was open. Beau Rivage opened on the 1 year anniversary date to a packed house. Inland one block, I could not orient myself in this place where I had spent so many happy years. Just piles of concrete, torn-up streets, no white, slate-sided shotgun houses, no street signs.

Working people won’t return to these former neighborhoods. The land’s value has actually increased because multiple lots can be bought by developers. Boomtown. Hurricane-aware, hardened, battened down.

Maybe the Ocean Springs bridge shouldn’t be rebuilt. Turn east Biloxi’s nascent casino row into an intentional destination accessible via the Interstate 10 just north and Highway 90 to the west.

So you think there’s time to change the direction of impending environmental disaster? Perhaps you don’t think it’s your business (or mine) to even consider doing anything.

Just answer this: what would 4 1/2 feet of water do to your town?

Well you can’t club the person who insists there’s nothing wrong with the environment like a baby seal. You have to reason with them, even if they’re as dumb as a post.

Here’s a great page to help you do just that. Thanks to Coby Beck at Ill Considered for this great thread.

Another hysterical “the sky is falling” environmental site? Not exactly. The Whirled Home Journal exaggerates or misrepresents nothing with regard to our declining environmental state. The stories you find here are, sad to say, true. Statements written and posted to this journal will always be backed by factual evidence.

Beyond the gloom and doom, this site will focus on the positive things people can do to reduce their environmental footprint. At least people with a heart and a conscience.

If you want to live in the state of denial, fine. Your children will pay the price. Not you.

If you want to improve life on earth, welcome. Your children will thank you for sticking up for what is right and good and sustainable.

©1997-2011 Jay Toups :-)